WD Red 3TB hdd hangs on a bad section of the disk

  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for some very handy tips!

    /Steve.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)

tahoebill

New member
Feb 27, 2023
3
0
I have a 3TB WD Red hdd recently marked as "degraded" by my Synology NAS. I placed the drive in an eSATA dock and formatted it in Windows and found that it passed "CHKDSK /x /f /r". When I tried to test the drive in Spinrite 6.1 using levels 1 through 3, it hung up in a loop trying to read a bad area on the disk, constantly switching between 16 and 256 sector reads.
 
Last edited:
I have a 3TB WD Red hdd recently marked as "degraded" by my Synology NAS. I placed the drive in an eSATA dock and formatted it in Windows and found that it passed "CHKDSK /x /f /r". When I tried to test the drive in Spinrite 6.1 using levels 1 through 3, it hung up in a loop trying to read a bad area on the disk, constantly switching between 16 and 256 sector reads. I wonder if Spinrite depends on the drive generating a timeout on unsuccessful reads. Normal desktop drives generate read timeouts, whereas NAS drives do not.
I think if you watch SpinRite's “Real Time Activities” screen you'll find that SpinRite is slowly moving forward rather than looping. If the drive has a "region" of trouble, SpinRite will gradually work its way forward through that region. During SpinRite 6.1's extensive development work we found that asking damaged drives to read larger blocks at once was far less useful than asking for only a few. So, when SpinRite encounters a problem is drops down to much smaller read requests while it works past the trouble. After encountering a problem with a sector it will drop to 16 sector transfers (as you saw) in the hope of getting that to succeed. If it can it'll cautiously move up to 256 sector requests for a while, then finally return to its highest-speed 32,768 sector transfers.

So, @tahoebill, from your description it appears that everything is working correctly. (y)
 
OK, that seems reasonable. I just got frustrated watching it through over 12,400 iterations with nothing changing on the screen except switching the read size between 16 and 256 sectors. Maybe once the sector has irrecoverable bytes, the whole sector can just be marked as bad, rather than trying to read the rest of the bytes?
 
The trouble is, many users probably really really want to get every last bit of data from the drive. We DO allow SpinRite's data recovery "strength" to be tuned up or down — even down to zero! — but we've kept that as a command-line option since it needs to be used with care!
 
So there is one thing you need to be aware of. RED drives are specially designed for use in a NAS, and run a different firmware that is supposed to allow the NAS to have more control. If you look on your drive label, it will probably say something like NASWare 2.0 or something. Because NASes are focused on data security, they are usually much more inclined to report a problem as soon as possible, to give you enough time to replace the drive before it fails completely. When it comes to NASes it's always better to replace a failing drive and rebuild your RAID before the drive dies, the RAID degrades or fails, and then your data is much more at risk. (You ARE doing backups though, right? RAID is NOT a backup.)