The war plan the U.S. Defense Department sent via Signal to the Atlantic magazine

[peterblaise]

At least US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had
100% possession and control of their tech gear.

Signal is outside of any such possession or control, plus
other compromises, see
https://www.google.com/search?q=signal+breach+and+security+compromises

But it does point to a varied response - consider the
endless scrutiny afterwards given to one and not the
other.

It's not about security <-- one subject here - it's who's
in 'power' at the time of discovery.

 

[Fuzzball]

Wow, not sure where that's coming from, but it comes off as quite defensive.

The guy in charge is a convicted felon....

But this is getting off topic, so let's get back to the Signal/Atlantic issue.

Not defensive at all. I do not like politicians from any party. I've never belonged to a political party and would never consider doing so.

You are the ones who want to talk politics and throw your party's spaghetti on the wall to see what sticks, and then feign that you are the ones who wish to stay on topic.

And I make the same claim about you. If the convicted felon was in the other party it would not change your vote one iota. You BELONG to a political party. You do not think for yourself.

 

[peterblaise]

Security wise, "the other party" has kicked people out for
bad humor, so no, the "convicted felons in both parties"
attempted rationalization doesn't fly.

Security wise, Trump wondered how Biden could possibly
win when Trump never saw anyone wearing a Biden hat -
because people voted against Trump, not for Biden, "the
other party" is not a party of personality, but by
comparison, is a party of Constitutional law..

Security wise, "The war plan the U.S. Defense Department
sent via Signal to the Atlantic magazine" continues to get
worse, sending US government war plans to a
non-governmental broadcaster, part of a broadcasting
system that has admitted in court that they lie to the public,
sending those plans to spouse and sibling, using an
insecure personal phone to do so, things an enlisted US
soldier would be court-martialed for, but all of this
misbehavior from the top because the US has put a
convicted felon in charge of the law.

Security wise, there is no security if people willfully
misbehave.

GRC Forums wise, this is international, not everyone here
votes in the US, but everyone can see the decay in US law.

 

[PHolder]

You do not think for yourself.

That's quite enough of this line of interaction. This is NOT polite discourse and any more like it will be moderated.