The risk of being there and being caught

  • SpinRite v6.1 is Released!
    Guest:
    That's right. SpinRite v6.1 is finished and released. For the full story, please see this page in the "Pre-Release Announcements & Feedback" forum.
    /Steve.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in:

    This forum does not automatically send notices of new content. So if, for example, you would like to be notified by mail when Steve posts an update to his blog (or of any other specific activity anywhere else), you need to tell the system what to “Watch” for you. Please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for details about that... and other tips!

    /Steve.
  • Announcing “BootAble” – GRC's New Boot-Testing Freeware
    Please see the BootAble page at GRC for the whole story.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)


Lob

What could possibly go wrong?
Nov 7, 2020
161
44
Spurred on ny SN891 and the risk of an attacker being there and being possibly caught, it reminded me of this work by the Chaos Computer Club.

https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2022/chaos-computer-club-hackt-video-ident

I had to assess this at work because we use video identification in certain non-contact processes. I had to summarise the following:
  • Faking identity is nothing new but being able to do it from somewhere else, somewhere safe is reducing the risk for the attacker; it's a 21st century version of the backstreet fake ID and some make-up
  • Being able to disrupt the ID or the video feed will always be a risk (consider the French minister video from some years ago)
  • The future will continue to be filled with what attackers think are low-risk, high-reward attacks and scams
  • Your defence in depth will be what protects you - never rely on a single control
I am in an environment that is heavily regulated and involves acronyms like KYC and AML.

@Steve most of this CCC is in German but I can summarise. It took a long time to build up for this attack, leveraged identical twins and still was not that effective (but of course Schneier's Rule still applies).
 
  • Like
Reactions: rfrazier