Steve thing about auto update on hardware

  • DNS Benchmark v2 is Finished and Available!
    Guest:
    That's right. It took an entire year, but the result far more accurate and feature laden than we originally planned. The world now has a universal, multi-protocol, super-accurate, DNS resolver performance-measuring tool. This major second version is not free. But the deal is, purchase it once for $9.95 and you own it — and it's entire future — without ever being asked to pay anything more. For an overview list of features and more, please see The DNS Benchmark page at GRC. If you decide to make it your own, thanks in advance. It's a piece of work I'm proud to offer for sale. And if you should have any questions, many of the people who have been using and testing it throughout the past year often hang out here.
    /Steve.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for some very handy tips!

    /Steve.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)

PeterUK

Active member
Oct 30, 2024
26
3
So things like routers, IoT, switches and AP are the main things you want to firmware update due to any vulnerability and that auto update is a good thing? Well I don't but hear me out...

let say you don't have a UPS well the worst that can happen is you have a power cut when doing the firmware update by auto or manual .

But what if you do have a UPS well worst case by auto the power cuts and and the firmware is updating seconds before the UPS gives up and the device did not complete the update in time. But if you do the update manually you know you have power so if you click start and right then a power cut happens it will be more likely to complete in time.
 
Appropriate and well-thought-out updates
keep the old version until the new version is
verified, so a power cycle in the middle of an
update just reverts to the prior version, so we
can try, try, try again.

Does anyone know of a vendor that promises
this, or a way to test?

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelRSorg
I worked on embedded development for most of my career. If you're not making the product the most dirt cheap you can, it's generally pretty easy to always have two working firmware images, a current and a future. You write the future version, and a checksum with it, and if it can't checksum on boot, then you fall back to the previous last known good. So, you know the write to the new version succeeded because the checksum is valid... and you can also throw in logic that counts the number of failed boots or recent reboots, and falls back to a previous version if the new version is having trouble coming up or staying up. This is not actually a hard computer science problem... it just costs a little more for the extra storage and memory and development/testing.
 
Peplink routers
I kind of hoped, for the price, they would have some higher end network ports... at least 2.5G but full multi-gig would be an option. These days 1.5G, 3G, 5G and higher WAN speeds are available from some ISPs (certainly from Bell Canada fibre they are.)