Hi there,
Recently I've met similar problems about 3rd-party SATA controllers when running RS on a somewhat custom Celeron J1900-powered mobo. Just like this:
That controller, which turns out to be Marvell 88SE9215, prevented RS from recognizing my 2 spinners attached to it; whilst another tiny SSD connected directly to the SoC was recognized and benchmarked as intended.
My question is: would that be MANDATORY that connections via Intel's (or AMD's) controllers are required?
Best wishes,
Bersella
Recently I've met similar problems about 3rd-party SATA controllers when running RS on a somewhat custom Celeron J1900-powered mobo. Just like this:
Code:
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| PCI v1 Simple DOS-based PCI System Enumerator GRC |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
+ Contemporary PCI subsystem detected.
Bus# Device Fnc Clas PgIf Type Vendor Device SubVen SubSys
---- ------ --- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
0 31 0 0601 00 8086 0F1C 8086 0F1C
0 31 3 0C05 00 8086 0F12 8086 0F12
0 28 0 0604 00 8086 0F48 -- --
0 28 1 0604 00 8086 0F4A -- --
0 28 2 0604 00 8086 0F4C -- --
0 28 3 0604 00 8086 0F4E -- --
0 27 0 0403 00 8086 0F04 8086 0F04
0 26 0 1080 00 8086 0F18 8086 0F18
0 20 0 0C03 30 8086 0F35 8086 0F35
0 19 0 0106 01 AHCI 8086 0F23 8086 0F23
0 2 0 0300 00 8086 0F31 8086 0F31
0 0 0 0600 00 8086 0F00 8086 0F31
3 0 0 0200 00 8086 1539 8086 --
2 0 0 0106 01 AHCI 1B4B 9215 1B4B 9215
My question is: would that be MANDATORY that connections via Intel's (or AMD's) controllers are required?
Best wishes,
Bersella