Moxie Marlinspike hacks the hackers (Cellebrite)

  • SpinRite v6.1 Release #3
    Guest:
    The 3rd release of SpinRite v6.1 is published and may be obtained by all SpinRite v6.0 owners at the SpinRite v6.1 Pre-Release page. (SpinRite will shortly be officially updated to v6.1 so this page will be renamed.) The primary new feature, and the reason for this release, was the discovery of memory problems in some systems that were affecting SpinRite's operation. So SpinRite now incorporates a built-in test of the system's memory. For the full story, please see this page in the "Pre-Release Announcements & Feedback" forum.
    /Steve.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for some very handy tips!

    /Steve.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)

This is a very good story for security:


Basically, Moxie went out for a walk one day, saw a package fell off the back of a truck. That package was clearly marked Cellebrite and contained the latest software/physical hacking tools of Cellebrite.

Moxie then reverse-engineered Cellebrite’s hacking software and found their software riddled with LOTS of security holes. Basically, if Cellebrite’s software is used to try to hack a bobby-trapped device, the Cellebirite software itself will get counter-hacked. Moxie released a proof-of-concept code to do that!

If the Cellebrite software itself is counter-hacked, then all the forensic evidence it collected (both previously and presently) can be altered by the counter-malware. That means that in the context of law-enforcement, the collected ‘evidences’ produced by Cellebrite can be unreliable and thus, ought to be inadmissible in court.

And there’s a kicker. Moxie found that Cellebrite‘s software included copyrighted code from Apple. Given that Apple is so zealous about their intellectual property, and they have an interest in disrupting Cellebrite’s business model, we can easily foresee that Apple’s lawyers will soon go after Cellebrite like sharks going after blood.

Time for 🍿!
 
Where I come from "fall off a truck" is a euphemism for helping oneself to something they're not otherwise entitled to.
True, but in this case its not a euphemism, he says he literally saw it fall off the truck and he doesn't say he made any effort to contact the owner.

My apologies in advance, I am an inveterate pedant.
 
There's a chance he made up the fall of a truck story and went far enough to show it on the ground to make that story believable. Like he bought it via a way he doesn't want to be closed off from being able to buy it again.
 
There's a chance he made up the fall of a truck story and went far enough to show it on the ground to make that story believable. Like he bought it via a way he doesn't want to be closed off from being able to buy it again.
I don't see why he would. It increases his chances of getting arrested or sued or both. All he needed to do was not say anything about how he got it.
 
If the reason the way he got it was staged, it might be to protect the actual buyer. Cellebrite might not allow some random person to buy their products so Moxie can't really buy it directly from them as a result, but he knows someone who can.
 
Should we focus on how he got it or on what he did with it? It seems like we've focused on the former to some extent which might be nearly enough; barring any new information of significance pertaining to the former, perhaps we should start shifting toward discussion of the latter.

:)