Is this transfer speed correct?!

  • SpinRite v6.1 Release #3
    Guest:
    The 3rd release of SpinRite v6.1 is published and may be obtained by all SpinRite v6.0 owners at the SpinRite v6.1 Pre-Release page. (SpinRite will shortly be officially updated to v6.1 so this page will be renamed.) The primary new feature, and the reason for this release, was the discovery of memory problems in some systems that were affecting SpinRite's operation. So SpinRite now incorporates a built-in test of the system's memory. For the full story, please see this page in the "Pre-Release Announcements & Feedback" forum.
    /Steve.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for some very handy tips!

    /Steve.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)

hoofinrocket

New member
Jan 6, 2021
3
1
Hey,
My speeds compared to others on the forum seems incredible high. Granted it is a decent production server but here are the results for x2 WD Gold spinners and x2 Samsung SSD EVOs.

Intel Xeon E3-1240 @ 3.4GHz
32GB Mem


Code:
Driv Size  Drive Identity     Location:    0      25%     50%     75%     100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
 81  1.0TB WDC WD1003FBYZ-010FB0        1643.0  1529.6  1321.9  1152.8   782.5
 82  2.0TB WDC WD2005FBYZ-01YCBB3       2513.9  2403.4  2174.0  1813.3  1315.4
 83  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T    6871.4  6859.4  6848.7  6848.9  6874.1
 84  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T    6856.0  6849.3  6839.7  6841.9  6867.1

                  Benchmarked: Wednesday, 2021-01-06 at 18:49


A second attempt with similar results.

Code:
Driv Size  Drive Identity     Location:    0      25%     50%     75%     100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
 81  1.0TB WDC WD1003FBYZ-010FB0        1643.0  1529.6  1321.9  1152.8   782.1
 82  2.0TB WDC WD2005FBYZ-01YCBB3       2518.0  2403.4  2174.0  1821.8  1315.4
 83  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T    6871.3  6858.7  6849.7  6850.2  6874.1
 84  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T    6859.6  6852.9  6844.4  6846.7  6871.0

                  Benchmarked: Wednesday, 2021-01-06 at 19:00
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Barry Wallis
Those speeds do seem very high. How are the disks connected? SATA III should have a maximum speed of 6Gb/s which should give you just under 600MB/s. Your figures seem to be about 10 times that. NVMe drives should be faster, but ReadSpeed does not detect those yet.
 
PCI cards? Ram disk? Ram cache?

May your bits be stable and your interfaces be fast. :cool: Ron
 
Hey,

The mobo is a S1200V3RPL, so all SATA 3 ports.
The drives are in a hot swap cage with what looks like a G15584-301 Hot-Swap backplane.
The backplane has a single connection to a breakout of the x4 SATA-3 ports on the mobo.

No PCI Cards, No RAM disk. No ram cache that I am aware of, but can not guarantee
No NVME either.

Ya, these numbers seem off, unless I am getting 54Gb/s! Haha, i may need to put it in a freezer so my tower doesnt melt down.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Barry Wallis
Hey Steve,
I do not recall what was at that top for the first/second runs. However, I powered everything off, reboot and and re-ran the benchmarks (standar windows troubleshooting :) ). I am now getting the results I would expect. Also, the top bar was showing +/-149 picoseconds which I believe to be correct on the re-run.
Thanks for your time and work!
Code:
Driv Size  Drive Identity     Location:    0      25%     50%     75%     100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
 81  1.0TB WDC WD1003FBYZ-010FB0         127.7   118.9   102.8    89.6    60.8
 82  2.0TB WDC WD2005FBYZ-01YCBB3        192.0   182.6   166.0   139.5   101.8
 83  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T     533.9   533.1   532.2   532.3   534.1
 84  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T     533.2   532.8   532.0   532.1   534.1

                  Benchmarked: Wednesday, 2021-01-06 at 21:40

Code:
Driv Size  Drive Identity     Location:    0      25%     50%     75%     100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
 81  1.0TB WDC WD1003FBYZ-010FB0         127.7   118.8   102.8    89.6    60.8
 82  2.0TB WDC WD2005FBYZ-01YCBB3        195.8   186.9   169.0   141.5   102.2
 83  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T     534.0   533.1   532.3   532.4   534.2
 84  1.9TB Samsung SSD 860 DCT 1.92T     533.0   532.5   531.9   532.0   533.9

                  Benchmarked: Wednesday, 2021-01-06 at 21:43
 
@hoofinrocket if you are getting 54 Gbps: 1) patent it. 2) seek venture capital. 3) get body armor. Somebody might see that as a threat to business.

May your bits be stable and your interfaces be fast. :cool: Ron
 
Those figures now look reasonable - good but within expectations. I am guessing that the 1TB disk is a little older.