Is AES-128 still safe to use?

  • SpinRite v6.1 is Released!
    Guest:
    That's right. SpinRite v6.1 is finished and released. For the full story, please see this page in the "Pre-Release Announcements & Feedback" forum.
    /Steve.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in:

    This forum does not automatically send notices of new content. So if, for example, you would like to be notified by mail when Steve posts an update to his blog (or of any other specific activity anywhere else), you need to tell the system what to “Watch” for you. Please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for details about that... and other tips!

    /Steve.
  • Announcing “BootAble” – GRC's New Boot-Testing Freeware
    Please see the BootAble page at GRC for the whole story.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)


Harry

Member
Oct 13, 2020
17
3
There's an interesting note in the CISA SolarWinds incident response recommendations:

"Set account options for service accounts to support AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96 and not support DES, RC4, or AES128 bit encryption"


Is CISA suggesting that AES-128 is no longer secure? I understand that people should choose the most secure encryption reasonably possible, but that's different than instructing people to not support something. I hope this isn't one of those cases where CISA knows something and aren't telling us yet. A more conspiratorial view is that the US government knows a foreign adversary has cracked AES-128. I think that's unlikely, but possible.
 
Well according to https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5.pdf (look for 5.6.3 Projected Security Strength Time Frames and Current Approval Status) 128bit is still permitted for use up until 2030. I suspect if there is any concern, it is related to the progress of quantum computers and the worry they might significantly reduce the strength of algorithms not specifically hardened again quantum computing.
 
Well according to https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5.pdf (look for 5.6.3 Projected Security Strength Time Frames and Current Approval Status) 128bit is still permitted for use up until 2030. I suspect if there is any concern, it is related to the progress of quantum computers and the worry they might significantly reduce the strength of algorithms not specifically hardened again quantum computing.
That may be the case, but has CISA given this advice anywhere else? It seems like it is in the context of the SolarWinds situation.