Pending Inconsistent results between sub-block options (/3, /4, etc)

  • SpinRite v6.1 is Released!
    That's right. SpinRite v6.1 is finished and released. For the full story, please see this page in the "Pre-Release Announcements & Feedback" forum.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in:

    This forum does not automatically send notices of new content. So if, for example, you would like to be notified by mail when Steve posts an update to his blog (or of any other specific activity anywhere else), you need to tell the system what to “Watch” for you. Please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for details about that... and other tips!

  • Announcing “BootAble” – GRC's New Boot-Testing Freeware
    Please see the BootAble page at GRC for the whole story.
  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)


Well-known member
Dec 26, 2020
I stumbled across this while messing around with a drive I got recently (the Kingston below). I noticed that its /4 results were noticeably higher than its regular results. I tested a few more drives and discovered that they're the opposite. Most drives get slower with the higher options. I ran each test multiple times and calculated the average. I attached all of the logs below.

Crucial BX100
Sub-block level0%25%50%75%100%

Kingston SA400M8120G
Sub-block level0%25%50%75%100%

KingDian S100
Sub-block level0%25%50%75%100%

Intel SSDSA2M080G2HP
Sub-block level0%25%50%75%100%


  • Sub-block
    156.7 KB · Views: 282
SSDs are quite complex and data from a large read may be actually spread over several chips which can be accessed in parallel, in a RAID like manner. That's just one possible explanation I can quickly think of. So big chunk can be read from several chips in parallel > more data p/s > better benchmark.

Also, as 'chunk' size increases what also may come into play is handling of errors. More data you read at once, the bigger chance the drive has to handle an error, for example employing ECC correction. If we assume 1 MB data occupying 3 cells that need ECC correction, of several small chunk reads will not encounter error while only a few will, 'upping' average, reading data in 4 chunks while 3 need to wait for ECC correction may affect average in benchmark. I guess depending on properties of NAND chips, how well firmware is optimized, buffer size etc. you may find different tipping points.

Just thinking out loud, not pretending to be giving definitive answers.