Pending I'm a bit irritated with VailDrive results ...

  • DNS Benchmark v2 is Finished and Available!
    Guest:
    That's right. It took an entire year, but the result far more accurate and feature laden than we originally planned. The world now has a universal, multi-protocol, super-accurate, DNS resolver performance-measuring tool. This major second version is not free. But the deal is, purchase it once for $9.95 and you own it — and it's entire future — without ever being asked to pay anything more. For an overview list of features and more, please see The DNS Benchmark page at GRC. If you decide to make it your own, thanks in advance. It's a piece of work I'm proud to offer for sale. And if you should have any questions, many of the people who have been using and testing it throughout the past year often hang out here.
    /Steve.
  • Be sure to checkout “Tips & Tricks”
    Dear Guest Visitor → Once you register and log-in please checkout the “Tips & Tricks” page for some very handy tips!

    /Steve.

  • BootAble – FreeDOS boot testing freeware

    To obtain direct, low-level access to a system's mass storage drives, SpinRite runs under a GRC-customized version of FreeDOS which has been modified to add compatibility with all file systems. In order to run SpinRite it must first be possible to boot FreeDOS.

    GRC's “BootAble” freeware allows anyone to easily create BIOS-bootable media in order to workout and confirm the details of getting a machine to boot FreeDOS through a BIOS. Once the means of doing that has been determined, the media created by SpinRite can be booted and run in the same way.

    The participants here, who have taken the time to share their knowledge and experience, their successes and some frustrations with booting their computers into FreeDOS, have created a valuable knowledgebase which will benefit everyone who follows.

    You may click on the image to the right to obtain your own copy of BootAble. Then use the knowledge and experience documented here to boot your computer(s) into FreeDOS. And please do not hesitate to ask questions – nowhere else can better answers be found.

    (You may permanently close this reminder with the 'X' in the upper right.)

M

Merkosh

New member
Nov 20, 2025
1
0
Hi, folks,

I've just tried ValiDrive on twoUSB sticks fresh from China (should have known better ...), and I'm a bit irritated. I've found out previously, that both devices, while advetrised with USB 3.something, have transfer rates matching USB 2.0 much better (~14MB/s with one, 7MB/s for the oather).

My curiosity got triggered, and I tried ValiDrive on them. ValiDrive interestingly told me that on both drives only the first 4kB (kiloByte) were good. This looked a bit weird to me, so I had a run of h2testw on them for the first 100 MB. That went fine.

The results are attached ...

Any hint why ValiDrive got these weird results ?
 

Attachments

  • 2TB.png
    2TB.png
    23.7 KB · Views: 89
  • 16TB.png
    16TB.png
    48.3 KB · Views: 78
Most likely, the first block on ValiDrive's test (on the graph) returned bad data. If the drives are bad, I would think ValiDrive wrote to the first block, then wrote other blocks, and by the time it read the first block, the drive overwrote the data that was there because too many other blocks were written to.
 
Merkosh said:
Any hint why ValiDrive got these weird results ?
Click to expand...
Because the drives are fake. And their hacked firmware is lying. When ValiDrive compares what it is seeing with the lies from the hacked firmware, ValiDrive reports weird results.
 
@Merkosh - awaiting your re-run of ValiDrive and uploading your
results so we can look over your shoulder and see what you see.

Here's a sample of my fake drive:

Report #1

test date and time 2023-11-09 at 9:50 PM
declared drive size 419,431,448,576 (419GB)
validated drive size 31,366,295,552 (31.4GB)
highest valid region 31,366,295,552 (31.4GB)
hub or drive vendor kingston ( hub adapter )
hub or drive product uhsii_usd_reader
serial number 20210500001994

1765391667363.png


performance details

read write
samples 1,152 1,152
minimum 6,744 5,327
maximum 55,943 3,205,562
average 45,674 112,379
median 48,745 10,431
std dev 10,787 519,273
variance 0.236 4.621
total time 52,617,561 129,460,820
percent 28.90% 71.10%
time measurements in microseconds

Yours may be different, so let's see!

Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
very interesting results
Replies
7
Views
2K
ValiDrive
DanR
D
J
Have drive that tests OK with Validrive But...
Replies
12
Views
3K
ValiDrive
Jan J
J
R
Can a fake drive fake a full format?
Replies
11
Views
4K
ValiDrive
rd369151
R
genevish
  • Contains 2 staff post(s)
ValiDrive on a Mac with Wineskin?
Replies
4
Views
3K
ValiDrive
Steve
Steve
P
ValiDrive - potential results database?
Replies
6
Views
2K
ValiDrive
walthouser
walthouser
Top Bottom
Back