I don't think there's anything spectacular here, but here are five 5 TB Toshiba drives and an SSD:
And here's an older machine that I learned I used the wrong SATA connector for:
After fixing the problem. Not a life changing change on these older spinning drives, but it still feels tidier:
Code:
Driv Size Drive Identity Location: 0 25% 50% 75% 100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
81 250GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB 538.3 537.3 538.5 539.0 541.6
82 5.0TB TOSHIBA HDWE150 205.3 185.4 170.4 140.8 99.3
83 5.0TB TOSHIBA HDWE150 212.1 195.3 175.7 150.8 106.3
84 5.0TB TOSHIBA HDWE150 204.8 188.2 170.4 144.9 100.6
85 5.0TB TOSHIBA HDWE150 210.7 193.9 175.2 145.6 103.0
86 5.0TB TOSHIBA HDWE150 200.3 194.7 168.2 146.2 103.6
Benchmarked: Thursday, 2020-12-31 at 06:09And here's an older machine that I learned I used the wrong SATA connector for:
Code:
NOTE: A faster SATA drive is attached to a slower SATA link. You may add
the /ident command-line option to display and identify the drive.
Driv Size Drive Identity Location: 0 25% 50% 75% 100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
81 250GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB 504.7 521.5 543.9 535.5 532.8
82 1.0TB Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 130.1 93.7 98.9 87.9 58.2
83 5.0TB ST5000DM000-1FK178 177.1 165.4 150.4 129.6 80.6
Benchmarked: Wednesday, 2020-12-30 at 18:02After fixing the problem. Not a life changing change on these older spinning drives, but it still feels tidier:
Code:
Driv Size Drive Identity Location: 0 25% 50% 75% 100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
81 250GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB 509.6 525.8 543.5 537.5 535.6
82 5.0TB ST5000DM000-1FK178 182.9 165.7 150.4 129.6 80.6
83 1.0TB Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 128.2 74.4 93.1 87.7 55.2
Benchmarked: Wednesday, 2020-12-30 at 18:21
