Not sure there is anything to see here, but I thought the SSDs should be more consistent. The 2 Samsung SSDs are in a RAID 0 array. They are probably around 5 years old now. I'm posting 2 runs that I did back to back.
Code:
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ReadSpeed: Hyper-accurate mass storage read-performance benchmark. rel 1 |
| Benchmarked values are in megabytes read per second at five locations. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Driv Size Drive Identity Location: 0 25% 50% 75% 100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
81 250GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB 338.1 476.0 391.3 530.7 405.6
82 320GB WDC WD3200AAKS-00VYA0 74.9 71.7 64.4 54.7 35.9
3 250GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB 301.8 454.6 334.6 528.4 380.8
Benchmarked: Saturday, 2020-12-26 at 19:41
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See the ReadSpeed forums at forums.grc.com for help and community support.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ReadSpeed: Hyper-accurate mass storage read-performance benchmark. rel 1 |
| Benchmarked values are in megabytes read per second at five locations. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Driv Size Drive Identity Location: 0 25% 50% 75% 100
---- ----- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
81 250GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB 368.0 474.0 398.1 531.0 408.2
82 320GB WDC WD3200AAKS-00VYA0 74.9 71.7 64.4 54.7 35.9
3 250GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB 351.0 463.7 352.7 531.6 397.8
Benchmarked: Saturday, 2020-12-26 at 19:44
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See the ReadSpeed forums at forums.grc.com for help and community support.